THROWBACK THURSDAY FEATURING MR. ROGERS!

Featured in The Atlantic back in June of 2018, author Maxwell King discusses the simple language dubbed "Freddish", inspired by the one and only Mr. Fred Rogers.

This article was adapted from Maxwell King's book, The Good Neighbor: The Life and Work of Fred Rogers
Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/06/mr-rogers-neighborhood-talking-to-kids/562352/

  

Mr. Rogers Had a Simple Set of Rules for Talking to Children: The TV Legend possessed an extraordinary understanding of how kids make sense of language.


Fred Rogers on the set of Mr. Rogers's Neighborhood in 1993GENE J. PUSKAR / AP

For the millions of adults who grew up watching him on public television, Fred Rogers represents the most important human values: respect, compassion, kindness, integrity, humility. On Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood, the show that he created 50 years ago and starred in, he was the epitome of simple, natural ease.
But as I write in my forthcoming book, The Good Neighbor: The Life and Work of Fred Rogers, Rogers’s placidity belied the intense care he took in shaping each episode of his program. He insisted that every word, whether spoken by a person or a puppet, be scrutinized closely, because he knew that children—the preschool-age boys and girls who made up the core of his audience—tend to hear things literally.
As Arthur Greenwald, a former producer of the show, put it to me, “There were no accidents on Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood.” He took great pains not to mislead or confuse children, and his team of writers joked that his on-air manner of speaking amounted to a distinct language they called “Freddish.”
Fundamentally, Freddish anticipated the ways its listeners might misinterpret what was being said. For instance, Greenwald mentioned a scene in a hospital in which a nurse inflating a blood-pressure cuff originally said “I’m going to blow this up.” Greenwald recalls: “Fred made us redub the line, saying, ‘I’m going to puff this up with some air,’ because ‘blow it up’ might sound like there’s an explosion, and he didn’t want the kids to cover their ears and miss what would happen next.”

The show’s final cuts reflected many similarly exacting interventions. Once, Rogers provided new lyrics for the “Tomorrow” song that ended each show to ensure that children watching on Friday wouldn’t expect a show on Saturday, when the show didn’t air. And Rogers’s secretary, Elaine Lynch, remembered how, when one script referred to putting a pet “to sleep,” he excised it for fear that children would be worried about the idea of falling asleep themselves.

Rogers was extraordinarily good at imagining where children’s minds might go. For instance, in a scene in which he had an eye doctor using an ophthalmoscope to peer into his eyes, he made a point of having the doctor clarify that he wasn’t able to see Rogers’s thoughts. Rogers also wrote a song called “You Can Never Go Down the Drain” because he knew that drains were something that, to kids, seemed to exist solely to suck things down.
In 1977, about a decade into the show’s run, Arthur Greenwald and another writer named Barry Head cracked open a bottle of scotch while on a break, and coined the term Freddish. They later created an illustrated manual called “Let’s Talk About Freddish,” a loving parody of the demanding process of getting all the words just right for Rogers. “What Fred understood and was very direct and articulate about was that the inner life of children was deadly serious to them,” said Greenwald. Per the pamphlet, there were nine steps for translating into Freddish:
  1. “State the idea you wish to express as clearly as possible, and in terms preschoolers can understand.” Example: It is dangerous to play in the street. ​​​​​​
  2. “Rephrase in a positive manner,” as in It is good to play where it is safe.
  3. “Rephrase the idea, bearing in mind that preschoolers cannot yet make subtle distinctions and need to be redirected to authorities they trust.” As in, “Ask your parents where it is safe to play.”
  4. “Rephrase your idea to eliminate all elements that could be considered prescriptive, directive, or instructive.” In the example, that’d mean getting rid of “ask”: Your parents will tell you where it is safe to play.
  5. “Rephrase any element that suggests certainty.” That’d be “will”: Your parents can tell you where it is safe to play.
  6. “Rephrase your idea to eliminate any element that may not apply to all children.” Not all children know their parents, so: Your favorite grown-ups can tell you where it is safe to play.
  7. “Add a simple motivational idea that gives preschoolers a reason to follow your advice.” Perhaps: Your favorite grown-ups can tell you where it is safe to play. It is good to listen to them.
  8. “Rephrase your new statement, repeating the first step.” “Good” represents a value judgment, so: Your favorite grown-ups can tell you where it is safe to play. It is important to try to listen to them.
  9. “Rephrase your idea a final time, relating it to some phase of development a preschooler can understand.” Maybe: Your favorite grown-ups can tell you where it is safe to play. It is important to try to listen to them, and listening is an important part of growing
Rogers brought this level of care and attention not just to granular details and phrasings, but the bigger messages his show would send. Hedda Sharapan, one of the staff members at Fred Rogers’s production company, Family Communications, Inc., recalls Rogers once halted taping of a show when a cast member told the puppet Henrietta Pussycat not to cry; he interrupted shooting to make it clear that his show would never suggest to children that they not cry.

In working on the show, Rogers interacted extensively with academic researchers. Daniel R. Anderson, a psychologist formerly at the University of Massachusetts who worked as an advisor for the show, remembered a speaking trip to Germany at which some members of an academic audience raised questions about Rogers’s direct approach on television. They were concerned that it could lead to false expectations from children of personal support from a televised figure. Anderson was impressed with the depth of Rogers’s reaction, and with the fact that he went back to production carefully screening scripts for any hint of language that could confuse children in that way.
In fact, Freddish and Rogers’s philosophy of child development is actually derived from some of the leading 20th-century scholars of the subject. In the 1950s, Rogers, already well known for a previous children’s TV program, was pursuing a graduate degree at The Pittsburgh Theological Seminary when a teacher there recommended he also study under the child-development expert Margaret McFarland at the University of Pittsburgh. There he was exposed to the theories of legendary faculty, including McFarland, Benjamin Spock, Erik Erikson, and T. Berry Brazelton. Rogers learned the highest standards in this emerging academic field, and he applied them to his program for almost half a century.
This is one of the reasons Rogers was so particular about the writing on his show. “I spent hours talking with Fred and taking notes,” says Greenwald, “then hours talking with Margaret McFarland before I went off and wrote the scripts. Then Fred made them better.” As simple as Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood looked and sounded, every detail in it was the product of a tremendously careful, academically-informed process.

FEATURED POST: READING ALOUD TO MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS by Kasey Short

This week our featured post comes from middle school language arts and social studies teacher, Kasey Short. Short attended UNC-Chapel Hill and earned a bachelor of arts in middle school education with a concentration in English and history. She then went on to earn a master’s of education in curriculum and instruction from Winthrop University. She is currently a sixth-grade language arts and social studies teacher as well as English Department Chair at Charlotte Country Day School.

original post date: May 14, 2019
Source:https://www.edutopia.org/article/reading-aloud-middle-school-students

By the time many students reach middle school, they no longer have books read aloud to them at home or at school. But research shows benefits of hearing books read aloud, including improved comprehension, reduced stress, and expanded exposure to different types of materials.





For five minutes of each class period, I read aloud to my middle school students. I’m often asked how I “give up time” each day to read, but the five minutes are a gift to my students. Spending this time each day enriches the classroom community, allows me to share a love of reading, enhances my language arts instruction, and exposes students to new authors, genres, and themes.

ENRICHING CLASSROOM COMMUNITY

During daily independent reading, students choose a book that is both interesting to them as individuals and appropriately challenging for their ability. Reading aloud provides an opportunity for students to experience a shared text together.
When choosing a book to read aloud, I look for books that represent diversity in a way that counters stereotypes and provides opportunities for students to develop compassion and understanding for others. As we read and discuss these powerful topics, students develop common connections and have an opportunity to practice civil discourse. Blended, by Sharon Draper, provides an opportunity to discuss code-switching, divorce, racism, police prejudice, and the biracial experience. Wishtree, by Katherine Applegate, tells a beautiful story through the eyes of a tree and provides an opportunity to discuss religious tolerance, Islamophobia, and friendship.
Scheduling read-aloud time for the last five minutes of class means that students walk out of class talking about the book and wondering what will happen next in the story. The suspense facilitates excitement around reading and engagement in the content for the entire instructional block.

CONNECTIONS TO CONTENT

Reading aloud allows me to model reading strategies. I ask questions, share my thoughts, and make connections between the text and other texts, as well as cross-curricular content. The book Same Sun Here, by Silas House and Neela Vaswani, provides an opportunity to connect to both science and social studies curricula. Throughout the novel, River, a Kentucky coal miner’s son, deals with the devastating environmental and human impact of mountaintop removal. Meena, an Indian immigrant, helps her mom prepare for the citizenship test and reflects on what it really means to be an American.
Using examples of the writer’s craft provides mentor texts for students in context. For example, while students are crafting their own memoir, I may stop to point out the sensory details the author uses and then allow them to discuss how that approach might be applied in their own writing. Students also have the opportunity to practice listening skills during this time. I approach it with them as a time for mindful listening and focus.
Modeling reading strategies also conveys my expectations for how students should approach their independent reading. I use several strategies I use here.
  • Thinking aloud: Demonstrate how to think critically and often about reading and making connections.
  • Monitoring understanding: Check for comprehension and reread when needed.
  • Visualizing text: Encourage students to think about what pictures form in their mind while reading.
  • Application: Ask students to consider how to connect the book to their own life, other books, current events, or cross-curricular content.
  • Questioning: Formulate questions about what students can learn from the text to apply to their lives.

SHARE A LOVE OF READING

Reading is fun. It allows us to experience other worlds and situations. Reading has the power to open hearts and humanize those who are often dehumanized. Reading the stories of others can help us to better understand and reflect on our own stories. Helping students find a love of reading sets them up for a lifetime of learning.
Reading each day to my students reinforces the value I place on reading and gives me a consistent opportunity to show my enthusiasm for books. It also provides some students an opportunity to enjoy a book without struggling to decode words. Careful selection of books also allows students to be introduced to new authors and genres.
Novels are my most common selection, but I also use picture books because they increase students’ exposure to diverse themes and characters as well as provide an opportunity to interpret and discuss pictures as text features. Last Stop on Market Street, written by Matt de la Peña and illustrated by Christian Robinson, uses beautiful language and vibrant illustrations to spark conversations about social responsibility, socioeconomic diversity, and finding beauty in our everyday lives. The Sandwich Swap, written by Queen Rania Al Abdullah of Jordan and Kelly DiPucchio and illustrated by Tricia Tusa, provides an opportunity to discuss how much everyone gains when we take the time to learn about each other’s cultures and beliefs. Illustrations can be useful for comprehension and engagement by middle school students.

FEATURED POST BY FRANK ACREE

What does reading mean to you?  We don’t ask ourselves that question very often, or ever.  I think that we should.  I am sure that some people can reduce their meaning down to a single crystalline concept. Or a poetic sentence of such breathtaking beauty that it would fit wonderfully in a greeting card to a new reader.  

I also know that isn’t me.  Reading for me is far too complex, too intertwined with my everyday life.  My work life involves writing and reading. My personal life involves writing and reading.  Two sentences so similar that they seem to be the same, but in reality they are opposite ends of a spectrum.
At work, my writing is to the point, factual, and minimalized.  If I can illuminate the result with fewer word, than that is exactly what happens.
At home, my writing is passionate, bizarre, fanciful, frightening, and detailed.  If something I am writing needs one word then ten words will do!   
I live in a world of written worlds.  Worlds often at extremes from each other, but they always transfer meaning. Whether that meaning is simple facts or the meaning is the description of the color of a sunrise in an alien world. 
Meaning is often lost in our world today.  How often have we heard, “I didn’t mean that.” Or “That’s not what I meant.”  We can, and often do, lose our perspective of meaning when our emotions are engaged before our minds.  This is as  true when you read a menu at a restaurant or when you read a political editorial.  Both are written to engage your emotions before your mind.  Both come with the potential for buyer’s remorse.
I hope what I have written here will cause you to seek the meaning in what you are reading and to seek the meaning as to why you read.
Now go out and read something.  Something with meaning, but keep the buyer’s remorse to a minimum.

FEATURED POST: IF YOU REALLY WANT TO CHANGE THE WORLD, READ A BOOK by Morgan Jackson

This week our featured post comes to us from Las Vegas, Nevada. High school English teacher Morgan Jackson  believes that teachers should push their students out of their comfort zones, but also be willing to leave their own.

ORIGINAL POST DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2019
SOURCE: https://nerdybookclub.wordpress.com/2019/09/02/if-you-really-want-to-change-the-world-read-a-book-by-morgan-jackson/

I can’t know everything about everyone, everywhere. No one can.  I’ll never forget reading Maya Angelou’s I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings for the first time with a group of high school juniors. I had a class of 21 students with just 4 girls and 11 of the 17 boys played varsity football.  We set the curriculum before we got class rosters so I planned out what I wanted to do with this novel over the summer. I looked over my roster and wondered aloud, to myself, and colleagues how this was going to work in such a testosterone filled classroom.  I wasn’t prepared for what happened. 
  

Day 1 we got caught on the idea of intraracial. All of my students were aware of the concept of interracial, but didn’t know what to make of the colorism that is described between Maya and Bailey. So as would become our custom with this novel I put on my history teacher hat, which I didn’t know I had, and we talked about colorism in America. We talked about house slaves and field slaves, and the paper bag test. My students brought up actors, actresses, singers, athletes, and anecdotal stories about skin tone and social norms.  I borrowed a scientist hat and tried my best to explain genetics and the concept of passing. I showed them images of people who appear white, but were not and twins who each appeared different races. That conversation got so spirited my principal who happen to be in the hallway stopped by to see what they were talking about. They left that day and I was tired, but the good tired, a satisfied tired. 

As time went on my history teacher alter ego explained sharecropping: what it was and how it worked. One young White student (a minority in this class) asked me “Isn’t that kind of just like slavery, but with a different name?” “That doesn’t seem fair” he remarked.  I could see the wheels turning in his head, but also in the head of every other student. They were bothered by the fact that the white kids who lived on Mama’s land were treated better than her in society and disrespected her in her own store. They were incredulous that a sheriff would warn Mama about “the boys” riding out at night so she could hide her son, but not actually do anything to stop the impending and predictable violence they would cause.  

I explained segregation and integration when Mama tried to take Maya to a white dentist, whom she had previously lent money to only to be turned away because he would rather stick his hand “in the mouth of a dog” than a colored person.  I introduced the class to the Little Rock 9 and then questioned why the brown kids didn’t already know this part of their history.  

We talked about culture. The importance of church in the black community. I showed them YouTube clips. We talked about food and its integral place in black fellowship. They worked with a partner, did mini research projects on an aspect from the book, and then presented it to the class.

We read the hard parts.  I warned them that some uncomfortable things were coming and when Mr. Freeman touched Maya for the first time, this group of teenagers (mostly boys, mostly minorities) so quickly dismissed by society as being nonchalant and apathetic, was visibly angry.  They questioned humanity and how anyone could do that. When I told them it got worse I had students ask if they could skip past that part because they couldn’t stomach it. 16 year old boys were too weak to read such a violation. They took it personally. They connected. They cared and they showed sympathy.

By the time we finished the book we had covered a lot of ground both inside and outside of the book, but more importantly, my students were thinking.  They were thinking about the world they live in. They were questioning how we got to where we are today and wondering about where we might be in the future.  They were realizing the power and possibilities inside of themselves. They saw themselves in a character who couldn’t have been more different from them. Some saw themselves in her violation, others in her isolation. Some students connected with her resiliency, or her abandonment. Regardless of how they connected or why we all finished that novel profoundly different than who we were when we started it.

I had changed too. I realized that while I did a hell of a job teaching this novel. I had started from a place of preconceived notions and expectations. I was surprised the white kids understood and the double standard and society’s mistreatment of the black community at large.  I was bothered by the black students lack of what I considered necessary black history. Then I realized I didn’t know them anymore than they knew Maya, and yet they didn’t prejudge her or make request of who they thought she should be, or know, or behave. I became a better teacher watching them interact with this text. I became a better person learning to let go of my expectations of my students, of the world, and of myself. 

That’s the power of a book. It opens us up to a world, a time period, a character, an issue that we may not have seen before and we can never go back to who were before our eyes were opened.  Changing the world doesn’t require that we do anything more than open a book and change ourselves. 

POSTS TO ENJOY

Procrastibaking: In the Kitchen with Julie (in Partnership with Literacy Connections)

Enjoy our first Thanksgiving special celebrating Literacy Connections and all things cookbook! https://www.procrastibakingpodcast.com/podcas...